Brown University Faculty Task Force on Faculty Governance Minutes 06.12.02


Brown University
Task Force on Faculty Governance
Minutes of Meetings


Minutes of The Task Force on Faculty Governance

July 10, 2002

Attending: Nancy Amstrong, Russell Church, Richard Fishman, Peter Gromet, John Savage, Anne Fausto-Sterling, and Rajiv Vohra

Absent: Michael White.

1. We approved the minutes of our meeting of June 12.

2. The task of this task force is to make proposals for better joint decision making by the Faculty and the Administration as well as proposals that are designed to promote better decision making that is strictly within the parameters of faculty governance. Even though the injunction to devise a faculty governance structure that enables better decision making occasionally requires us to consider changes in Brown's administrative structure that would serve this objective, we do not plan to make any formal recommendations about administrative structure that are outside our purview.

3. As stated in the minutes of our June 12 meeting, we will refer to the new VP for Research action on those committees that relate to the support of the research mission of the University. We also agreed that we would postpone action on those committee that relate to the Brown Medical School.

We agreed to recommend that ACUP be reconstituted as a provostial committee, that is, a committee called by the Provost to which the Provost makes appointments on the recommendation of the Faculty and other campus constituencies.

4. We revisited the draft descriptions of the three committees that have been organized previously, namely, the Academic Priorities Committee (APC), the Appointment, Promotion and Tenure (APT) Committee, and the Faculty Personnel Committee (FPC).

In the context of these descriptions, the word "divisions" means the campus-based life sciences, physical sciences, the social sciences, and the arts and humanities.

We made small changes in the description of APC. We decided to transfer the responsibility for handling grievances from the FEC to the FPC without changing the rules on this matter. We also made small changes in the description of the FPC.

The new draft descriptions of the three committees follow.

  ===============================DRAFT=======================================
  Academic Priorities Committee (APC)
  -----------------------------------
    o Responsibilities
    	* To make recommendations on all major academic matters, including
	  external reviews of and change of status in academic units,
	  appointment of external review committees, major academic budgetary
	  proposals, and strategic allocation of academic resources for
	  operational, instructional and research purposes, and
	  university-level external academic relationships
  	* To appoint its own ad hoc committees
	* The committee is not obliged to review all proposals sent to it.
  
    o Membership
        * Six senior academic administrators, six faculty.
	  Each year two slates of two faculty members will be prepared for
	  election by the Faculty. Candidates are to be chosen by the Provost
	  from a list prepared by the Faculty Executive Committee (FEC) (or its
	  replacement).

    o Reporting
	* The committee will make recommendations to President and submit
	  regular reports to the Faculty 

  ===========================================================================


  ===============================DRAFT=======================================
  Appointment, Promotion and Tenure (APT) Committee
  -------------------------------------------------
    o Reponsibilities
  	* Make recommendations to the Provost concerning faculty
  	  appointments, promotions, tenure
  	* Review and approve departmental standards, criteria and procedures
	  to ensure excellence across all areas of knowledge
	* Make annual reports to the Faculty and the Faculty Personnel Committee
  
    o Membership
  	* Four non-voting academic administrators (Deans of the Faculty,
  	  College, and Graduate School and Dean of Biology and Medicine) and
	  twelve voting full professors, three per division, elected
	  by the Faculty to staggered three-year terms.
  	* Faculty members should be representative of diversity in the Faculty.
  
    o Chair and Support
  	* Chair will be a faculty member
  	* An office, staff and budget are needed
  ===========================================================================

  ===============================DRAFT=======================================
  Faculty Personnel Committee (FPC)
  ---------------------------------
    o Responsibilities
  	* Supervise periodic professional assessment of the competitiveness
  	  of faculty salaries, benefits and leaves
  	* Recommend policy concerning faculty salary, benefits and leaves
  	* Assess and advise on faculty retention and recruitment policies
  	* Assess and promote faculty diversity
	* Implementation of existing grievance procedures.
 
    o Membership
  	* Six faculty members elected by the Faculty representative of the
    	  distribution of faculty members by division and rank. Faculty
  	  members will serve staggered three-year terms.
  
    o Support
  	* An office, staff and budget are needed
  
    o Reporting
  	* The Committee will report to the Faculty and the Academic
  	  Priorities Committee
  ===========================================================================
	
5. These three committees are expected to subsume the work of many exisiting
committees, as shown below.  We recommend that the current role of AMC to
screen faculty searches be handled administratively.

===========================================================================
Committee	Subsumes the work of the following committees
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
APC:	Academic Council; Academic Priorities Subcommittee; Committee on
	Admissions and Financial Aid; Faculty Committee on Educational
	Legislation.

APT:	CONFRAT

FPC:	Affirmative Action Committee (AMC); Awards and Benefits Committee;
	Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Committee; Status of Women
	Committee; Committee on Minority Faculty Recruitment.
===========================================================================

6. We recommend that the following committees be converted to advisory
committees appointed by and reporting to the relevant administrator with the
understanding that their existence should be dependent on the needs of the
administrator.

===========================================================================
Administrator	Current Committee	
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dean of College	Commencement Speakers
		Prizes and Premiums
		Resumed Undergraduate Education (RUE) Policy/Advising
D. of Admission	Resumed Undergraduate Education (RUE) Admissions
U. Librarian	Library Committee
VP for CIS	Faculty Advisory Committee on Computers
We recommend that the activities of the RUE committee be absorbed without dilution into the normal processes for admission, granting financial aid, and student advising.

7. We recommend the removal of the following committees.