![]() |
|
Attending: Nancy Amstrong, Russell Church, Anne Fausto-Sterling, Richard Fishman, Peter Gromet, John Savage, Rajiv Vohra, and Michael White.
We spent the bulk of our time reviewing the makeup of the faculty personnel committee that we had designed at our May 29 meeting whose responsibilites are shown below
We agreed that of the above listed activities the most important are faculty appointment, promotion and tenure. After reviewing the experience of committee members serving on or reporting to CONFRAT, we decided that we needed one committee for this task, as described below.
Appointment, Promotion and Tenure (APT) Committee
Reponsibilities
Our review of the other personnel tasks led us to propose the creation of a new Faculty Personnel Committee as described below.
Faculty Personnel Committee
We accept the proposition that periodic reviews of faculty governance are needed. In particular, such reviews can help correct for any deficiencies that are discovered in the new structure that we are proposing.
We will meet from 3-5pm on the following Wednesdays: June 12, July 10, 17, 24, and 31 in the English Department.
At our next meeting we will examine the implementation of educational policy as well as discuss mechanisms for disseminating knowledge of our discussions and soliciting feedback.
Submitted by
John E. Savage