Brown University
Task Force on Faculty Governance
Minutes of Meetings


Minutes of The Task Force on Faculty Governance

May 22, 2002

Attending: Nancy Amstrong, Russell Church, Anne Fausto-Sterling, Richard Fishman, Peter Gromet, John Savage, Rajiv Vohra, and Michael White.

Reports were given by the following individuals at the indicated universities

Member Institutions
Nancy Amstrong*Cornell Dartmouth
Russell ChurchBrown *Stanford
Richard Fishman*DukeWilliams
Peter Gromet Amherst *Berkeley
Rajiv Vohra *Chicago*Columbia
Michael White Princeton *Penn

After reviewing these universities, we decided that the large universities identified with an * do not provide good models for Brown.

Here are some highlights of schools that do provide good models:


DARTMOUTH
Has a weak Provost and strong Dean of the Faculty (DoF) who works with three associate deans that represent divisions within Arts and Sciences.

AMHERST
It's most important committees are the Committee of Six, the Committee on Educational Policy, and the Priorities and Resources Committee.

WILLIAMS
Its key elected committees are Committee on Appointments and Promotions (CAP), Faculty Steering Committee (FSC), Committee on Educational Policy (CEP), Faculty Review Panel, and Faculty Compensation Committee (FCC).

Faculty are appointed to all other committees. Each spring faculty specify their preferences for non-elective standing committees. The President through the Dean of the Faculty in consultation with the FSC appoints faculty to these committees.

FCC has divisional representatives and at-large members, the latter appointed by the FSC. FCC has 8 faculty, 10 administrators serving ex-officio

PRINCETON
More information on Princeton is being sought. However, we do have a description of the "Committee of Three," which handles appointments, promotions, tenure, and salaries, and the Budget Priorities Committee that handles the annual budget.


We agreed with the general governance outline given in the minutes of our meeting of May 10, namely, some form of academic planning council consisting of faculty and academic administrators, a budget priorities committee, and committees on faculty legislation. We also agreed that faculty legislative functions should be subdvided into the following categories:

  1. Educational Policy
  2. Faculty Personnel Issues
  3. Academic Planning and Allocation
  4. Nominations

We also agreed to develop through email communications the functions that should be handled within each subdivision.

Our next three meetings will be on May 29 and June 5 and 12 from 2-4pm in the English Department.

Submitted by
John E. Savage

Index of Taskforce Minutes