Complete the evaluation form below for the papers marked with a "*", and e-mail them class mailing list (reviews_295-1@list.cs.brown.edu) by noon on the meeting day. The subject line should read "Review: 'paper name'" (e.g., "Review: Data aggregation in sensor networks"). Be brief and to the point in your evaluations. | |
Your evaluations will be graded on a scale of [0,2]. The default grade is 1. If you do an extraordinary, very insightful review, you will get 2. If I think that you didn't make an effort to understand the paper or that you missed a key aspect, you will get 0. | |
Incomplete and late evaluations will not get any credit. | |
You will be graded by your top-10 evaluations: I will evaluate all your submissions, rank them by score, and use the top 10 for determining the final grade. |
Paper name. | |
Reviewer name. | |
Summarize the paper (no more than five sentences). | |
State the primary contribution of the paper (no more than three sentences). | |
State the most important strengths of the paper (no more than three; each in a single sentence). | |
State the most important limitations of the paper (no more than three; each in a single sentence). | |
Rate the significance of the paper (on a
scale of five) and justify your decision (no more than three sentences). 5 Breakthrough 4 Significant contribution 3 Modest contribution 2 Weak contribution 1 No contribution |
|
State a research question/issue the paper leaves open (no more than three sentences). |