Assign a grade to your specification based on the comments you
received back on it in writing from the staff and from other students.
You'll be e-mailed the grade given (this assignment will not impact
that grade) after this assignment is turned in.  The purpose of this
assignment is to calibrate how well you understand what a
specification should be.

Copy what's below to editor, edit, hand in to appropriate asgns
directory with filename AUTHOR_by_self.txt

================================ cut here ================================

Name: Colin Gordon
Grade you would assign: Low A or High B
Justification for that grade:
Other people seem to think the description and system model were very clear, and
that the components were fairly well described.  They also thought the UI mockup
was good, and that my written description of its components and their behavior
was thorough.  Both reviewers thought that the nonfunctional requirements lacked
enough description of testing scenarios and performance requirements, and both
found my description of priorities for components a little vague, and difficult
to distinguish the mandatory components from those which could be scrapped if
time required.  They also thought my assessment of the risks with the project
were accurate.  On the whole, my reviewers seemed to think my specification was
very good overall, but a little lacking in the nonfunctional requirements and
prioritization, so I feel that a low A or high B would be appropriate.