(copy to editor, edit, hand in to appropriate asgns directory with
filename AUTHOR_by_REVIEWER.txt)

Specifications Author: lquirk
Project Title: Thread Debugger
Reviewer: kpthomas

Evaluate the elements below on a scale from 1-5.  Add comments after
each as needed.  Copy in any text from the specification to make
appropriate comments.  Address comments to the author of the
specification.

	1) description of the project (from requirements);
	   4
	   Good description.  A bit too specific about features instead of
	concept and need for project.

	2) system model diagram;
	   3
	   Couldn't see diagram labels.  HTML problem.  

	3) annotations describing each component of the system model;
	   4
	   Component descriptions are fine but I don't know how they fit 
	together. There are more white circles than described components.

	4) user interface diagrams and descriptions;
	   5  
	   Very specific and well fleshed out.  Obvious how it will work.

	5) written description of the above;
	   4
	   Could be more verbose but the interface seems intuitive from the
	descriptive picture.

	6) non-functional requirements (performance, testing,
		reliability, ease of use, portability, documentation,
		dependencies on other systems);
	   3
	   Covered basics well but did not touch all areas listed above.  The 
	expectations are vague and could use specific numbers in addition to
	the comparisons to GDB.

	7) updated requirements (with priorities, etc.);
	   4
	   Not enough levels of separation for the requirements.  It seems hard 
	to divide the project into easy to do chunks.  Almost all of the 
	requirements seem necessary to make it a useful project.

	8) any risky parts.
	   5
	   Ably covers the challenges and risks of the project.

Other comments:

================================================================

Additional comments/changes after presentation: